Tempest in a tea cup
THE STATEMENT STORM
THERE IS NO NEED TO READ TOO MUCH INTO OMAR ABDULLAH STATEMENT `CHALLENGING' ACCESSION. THE STORY IS SIMPLE, COMMENTS HASHIM QURESHI
In response to Omar Abdullah's Accession speech, the opposition has reacted on two counts. PDP called it “an attempt of re-establishing credibility with the masses of the people while BJP and Panthers Party called it a conspiracy against India.” The separatists considered it vindication of their stand. Thus we find that all stakeholders interpreted the statement according to their own ideology and perception. Many non-state actors, too, expressed their views and characterized it as anti-India. We shall make an effort to analyze the entire case.
Omar Abdullah’s political career starting from hotel service to the platform of National Conference. He tried to create the impression that he would like to follow the footprints of his grandfather. That is why he adopted `Abdullah' and not `Farooq' his second name. He was conscious of the mystique surrounding the name of Abdullah. He introduced himself among the masses of people as one who adopted principled politics and was concerned about the progress and welfare of the people of the state.
Nevertheless, he found projection in the BJP government as “show boy” in the position of Minister of State for Foreign Affairs. In 2002 elections, he lost his traditional seat of Ganderbal to an ordinary candidate. During the coalition government of PDP and Congress, he failed to prove his mettle as the leader of opposition, and, after becoming MP, he remained out of the state for most of his time. Thus up to 2008, he did not have the opportunity of gaining experience in running the administration of the state. In other words, he was groomed in the traditional divisive political culture of National Conference.
Barring a portion of the period of NC rule under the leadership of Sheikh Abdullah, this party has generally played anti-people politics in this state. The highlights of its antagonistic policy are implementation of PSA law, not revoking Maharaja Hari Singh’s Enemy Ordinance, an extremely tyrannical law scripted by the British rulers of India to suppress the Indian masses. (the Maharaja had imposed the law after the tribal raid) and establishing of Task Force. These all are the gifts of National Conference rule. Apart from this, the party indulged in unbridled nepotism, bribery, and exploitation.
During 2008 elections, NC and Omar Abdullah in person made tall promises with the masses of people. Among the promises were the withdrawal of AFSPA, discarding PSA, providing employment to one member in each family, releasing the interned people and solving the Kashmir issue. After the election results were declared, NC agreed to form a coalition government with Congress despite the fact that it had always been castigating Congress as dishonest party that had acted deceptively a number of times during the rule of the Sheikh and Farooq.
During the two years of his tenure, Omar Abdullah did not do anything substantial in the interests of the masses of people. Leave aside any mega industry, even a garbage recycling plant was not established. Yet one more tragedy of Omar government is that it inherited a cabinet whose many members do not enjoy good reputation with the people. He was not able to undertake any initiative worth the name that would make people think that this young man had some potential to work for the welfare of the people in general. He could not come up to the expectations of the people who thought he was “good” to be a chief minister.
One reason for the decline of National Conference and Omar Abdullah is the wayward utterances and actions of his father Farooq. Bribery, nepotism and unleashing of tyranny on the people worked as the last nail in the coffin. Precisely, like the earlier chief minister, he became a sacrificial goat to the system. Neither AFSP nor PSA was withdrawn nor were the people provided employment nor was there any improvement in the supply of electric power and water.Thanks to Mufti Sahib and Azad Sahib, opposition political workers and leaders, NC true to its tradition, tried to suppress them through the instrumentality of police force. Police and CRP personnel undertook killing of innocent kids. The bloodshed of Tufail Mattoo whipped up anger and resentment among the masses of people which culminated in the killing of 111 persons so far. But despite all this, the issue of J&K could not be solved. Government tried to set off tension through the gimmick of dispatch of a parliamentary delegation to Kashmir.
It is said that unlike traditional politicians, Omar Abdullah does occasionally respond to the pricks of conscience. As such the history of the J&K State and the conditions prevailing at the moment became compulsions for him to speak candidly on Kashmir issue in the assembly that the state had acceded to the Indian but not integrated. However, in regard to accession, he did not say the whole truth. India took the issue to the United Nations and promised that Kashmiris would have the right to their final opinion. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru reiterated this promise no fewer than twenty times in the parliament, in his broadcasts through AIR and in various press conferences. He explained that referendum would be held in Kashmir in any case. He said “that if Kashmiris wanted to withdraw the accession and stay independent India would not put up armed resistance though the decision of secession of the Kashmiris would be painful for her. “
This clarifies that we had an agreement in the shape of accession with the Indian Union on the basis of which the state had agreed to four things viz. defence, currency, foreign affairs and communication. In the context of defence, the Indian forces were supposed not only to protect the borders of Kashmir, but also the safety and security of life, property and respect of the people of Kashmir were also to be taken care of. But not to speak of protecting life, property and honour of the people, Indian army has become an enemy of the people in their eyes. In regard to communication, India has not been able to make a road connection between Jammu and Ladakh during last 63 years. It is possible that the State of Jammu and Kashmir decides to rescind accession meaning the contract with the Indian Union. Omar Abdullah says that “we are not a part of India”.
Omar Abdullah’s statement weakens India’s cause in Kashmir in international circles. The Indian Minister of External Affairs declares at the UN that “Kashmir is an inseparable part of India and puts forth the arguments that there have been elections repeatedly and people have elected their representatives and as such it is an integral part of India.” But on the other hand, the Chief Minster of Jammu and Kashmir, National Conference and PDP assembly members get votes from the people by telling them they are asking votes for solving economic problems like roads, water and electricity and elections will not have any adverse impact on the nature of Kashmir issue.
India wants to counter the struggle of separatists through various types of propaganda. But when the chief minister rakes up in assembly a question on the election itself, it naturally strengthens the contention of Pakistan and separatists on international level that it is a dispute and awaits a decision.
We find there is some justification in New Delhi circles for displeasure against Omar Abdullah because India has been labeling it a law and order issue while India shies away form this reality. Omar Abdullah’s sincerity will be ascertained by his action whether he wants to translate his words into action or whether it is another ploy of NC of misleading and duping the masses of people.?
Omar Abdullah and Ali Muhammad Sagar had leveled charges against CRP in the beginning. But despite the killing of 111 persons including some kids, Omar Abdullah could not send in his resignation.? We know that even a rail accident, (even if it happens because of no one's fault or negligence) anywhere in the world forces a minister to resign. But here no wing is ruffled.
Who knows better than Omar Sahib that law and order in Kashmir is controlled by Delhi, and even the orders for opening schools are shot from Delhi. What more proof is needed to prove that the State government is a handmaiden of New Delhi?
A debate has begun in many political circles whether in response to this statement the government of Omar Abdullah should be dismissed or that this bitter pill should be swallowed. It is also considered whether it would be feasible that instead of bringing in a new chief minister, governor’s rule should be imposed and the path for fresh elections cleared. It is hotly rumoured that Omar Abdullah will be shown the door after the visit of the US President Obama is over. The Minister of External Affairs has defended Omar’s statement. In Congress circles, especially in the circles of State Congress the rumour making rounds is that after the dismissal of Omar Abdullah, a coalition government of PDP and Congress would be formed. And in case PDP is not inclined to form the coalition government, then Congress would form the government with its support from outside. If this, too, did not work, then both the houses of the legislative assembly would be called to session in which PDP members would absent themselves thus paving the way for Congress to form the government.
Circumstances on the ground are such that the central government is not in a position to bring in a new government in the state unless PDP becomes a part of it. However for PDP joining the coalition government would be tantamount to suicide. Thus if PDP does not form the government in coalition with the Congress, then the only option available is to impose governor’s rule after dismissing Omar Abdullah. Interestingly Farooq Abdullah is making a loud noise all over the country that “Omar Abdullah is single handedly fighting against the separatists and he should be supported.” In this way Farooq is promoting “communal nationalism” to save the chair for his son.
( Hashim Qureshi is Chairman JK Democratic Liberation Party. Feedback at email@example.com)
Lastupdate on : Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:30:00 Makkah time
Lastupdate on : Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:30:00 GMT
Lastupdate on : Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 IST
- MORE FROM OP-ED
‘Will hold APM to discuss election issues’
Srinagar, Oct 28: Chief Minister, Omar Abdullah today highlighted the importance of devolution of power to the public representatives at Panchayat level stressing on holding of elections to Panchayats More
- Srinagar City
Srinagar, Oct 28: Chattabal Weir—lowhead dam, has been regarded as an engineering marvel, built originally by British engineers a century ago when Kashmir was a princely state.Built from 1903 to 1907, More
Jammu, Oct 28: Seeking to bring professionalism in tourism, the tourism department is looking forward to send nearly 400 youth outside J&K for training to overcome the problem of absence of trained More
SOLIDARITY FOR KASHMIRIS
London, Oct 28: Amir Jama’at Islami Pakistan Administered Kashmir, Abdur Rashid Turrabi has said thousands of people would cross the Line of Control en masse from Pakistan side of Kashmir to express solidarity More