Punishment in appeals to be decided after going into merits: SC
PRESS TRUST OF INDIA
New Delhi, Dec 7: The Supreme Court has said the higher courts cannot proceed to decide quantum of sentence without going into the merits of the case when there is no challenge to the conviction in the appeal.
The apex court said the courts should not merely accept the "concession" of non-challenge of conviction and proceed on the punishment part as it is "impermissible" and would defeat the fundamental purpose of the justice delivery system.
"We are obliged to state that when a convicted person prefers an appeal, he has the legitimate expectation to be dealt with by the courts in accordance with law.
"Therefore, it is the obligation of the court to decide the appeal on merits and not accept the concession and proceed to deal with the sentence, for the said mode and method defeat the fundamental purpose of the justice delivery system. We may clearly state that the same being impermissible in law should not be resorted to," a bench comprising justices K S Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra said.
The apex court gave its findings in a case in which Chhattisgarh High Court had reduced the sentences of five convicts without going into the merits of the appeal against conviction as they had advanced arguments only on punishment.
While remanding the case to the high court for deciding convictions on merit, the apex court said even if the high court chooses to dismiss the appeal summarily, some brief reasons should be given so as to enable this court to judge whether the case requires any further examination.
"If no reasons are given, the task of this court becomes onerous inasmuch as this court would be required to perform the function of the high court itself by reappraising the entire evidence resulting in serious harassment and expense to the accused," Justice Misra said.
The verdict came on an appeal by convicts challenging their conviction and sentencing by the high court for offences of rioting and causing hurt to extort property in which the trial court had sentenced them from three years imprisonment to three months.
Lastupdate on : Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:30:00 Makkah time
Lastupdate on : Fri, 7 Dec 2012 18:30:00 GMT
Lastupdate on : Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:00:00 IST
- MORE FROM NATIONAL
Protests Erupt In Summer Capital; No Improvement Unless Consumers Cooperate: PDD
MUDDASIR ALI/ZAHID MAQBOOL
Srinagar, Dec 7: With power situation worsening in Kashmir, people on Friday took to roads in several parts of the summer capital here to protest against the erratic power supply amid biting cold conditions More
- Srinagar City
Rakh-e-Arth lacks basic amenities
Srinagar, Dec 7: Notwithstanding the Central government’s liberal funding on conservation of Dal Lake and rehabilitation of Dal dwellers, the state government has been unable to mitigate the sufferings More
Zubair Posted Spl Secretary Finance, Kumar Is Addl Secretary Planning
GK NEWS NETWORK
Jammu, Dec 7: The state government Friday ordered promotions and transfers in the middle-rung administration. As per the orders issued by the General Administration Department (GAD), Farooq Ahmad More
Rafah, Dec 7: Exiled Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal broke into tears on Friday as he arrived in the Gaza Strip for his first-ever visit, a landmark trip reflecting his militant group's growing international More
- GK Feature
A mother who lost her four sons and her husband to conflict in the past sixteen years
A MOTHER’S TRAGEDY
Sitting near the window of her modest home in Diver, Lolab, 120kms north of Srinagar, Jana Begum, 51, emptily stares around, heaving long sighs of “haye meray Khuda”, before talking about what she has More
Islamabad: Failure of the authorities to take measures for conservation of river Jhelum here has pushed it on the verge of extinction. Considered to be lifeline of Kashmir, the river is marred by More