Raising the Dead
Are such digs as Arafat's worthwhile?
THIS week, the pale stone tomb in Ramallah that houses the remains of the former Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat was pried open. Researchers plan to test samples of Arafat’s skeleton for signs of poison, after suspicious concentrations of the radioactive isotope polonium-210 were found on his clothes and toothbrush during an investigation this summer. Arafat’s final illness has been a source of speculation since his death in 2004; while medical records show his immediate cause of death was a stroke, many Palestinians believe he was murdered by Israel.
Arafat joins a macabre parade of recently exhumed famous figures. Just this month, Danish researchers announced that tests on the bones of the astronomer Tycho Brahe (exhumed in Prague in 2010) showed he probably perished of natural causes and not, as some had suggested, after being poisoned by his assistant, Johannes Kepler. Also in 2010, Simón Bolívar, Bobby Fischer and Nicolae Ceausescu were exhumed. Christopher Columbus was exhumed in 2003, Jesse James in 1995, Lee Harvey Oswald in 1981 — the list goes on.
Advances in DNA testing, biochemical analysis and other scientific techniques have unlocked the secrets of the dead from their blood, hair, teeth and bones in ways they never could have imagined. We can now use exhumations to lay to rest persistent rumors about the locations and contents of famous graves, and clear people like poor Kepler of murder charges. Exhumations can also tell us about the ailments of famous figures: fragments of Beethoven’s skull, left over from a 19th-century exhumation, have suggested that his poor health may have been the result of lead poisoning, and tests on Cosimo Medici’s bones showed he suffered from arthritis — not gout, as many historians had believed.
But when does scientific imperative shade into idle curiosity — and who gets to decide? Surprisingly, there’s little widely agreed-upon policy to guide us through this ethical quandary, and disputes have mostly been a matter for local courts. The regulations that protect living patients from scientific inquiry — designed to safeguard privacy and informed consent — generally disappear where the long dead are concerned. And yet, just because the dead feel no pain doesn’t mean they can’t be harmed.
In my opinion, exhumations can be a valuable research tool. The dead are dead, after all, while the living are still learning. But not all exhumations produce results of equal value, and we need more debate about when such digs are worthwhile. If conclusive proof of poisoning can be found from Arafat’s exhumation (a big if), the jackhammers might be justified.
But consider the request, motivated by a plan to analyze whether the Mona Lisa might be a disguised self-portrait, to disinter Leonardo da Vinci from his resting place in the Loire Valley. While it’s an intriguing question, is the answer really worth disturbing Leonardo’s grave? If we decide we don’t care, are we prepared for the idea that no one will care what happens to our own remains?
Some ethicists and legal scholars hope to create better frameworks for answering these questions, perhaps through the creation of “biohistorical review boards” that could analyze requests for exhumations and other analyses of the dead, much like the review boards that now weigh applications for studies involving living human subjects. Such boards might also consider whether future technologies could yield better results from exhumation — preventing people like Arafat from being dug up again every time there’s a scientific breakthrough.
For individuals — those with a legacy to protect, or secrets to hide — it might be time to consider a new section in the will. Or we could take a page out of Shakespeare’s book: his grave in Holy Trinity Church, in Stratford-upon-Avon, is engraved with the following curse:
Good friend for Jesus sake forbear
To dig the dust enclosed here!
Blest be the man that spares these stones,
And curst be he that moves my bones.
(The New York Times)
(Bess Lovejoy is the author of the forthcoming book “Rest in Pieces: The Curious Fates of Famous Corpses.”)
Lastupdate on : Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:30:00 Makkah time
Lastupdate on : Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:30:00 GMT
Lastupdate on : Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 IST
- MORE FROM OPINION
‘NC-Cong Coalition Represents People’s Voice’
GK NEWS NETWORK
Ganderbal, Nov 29: Chief Minister Omar Abdullah Thursday accused opposition PDP of luring Panchayat members through various tactics including money power. He said women Panchayat members are reportedly More
- Srinagar City
Parents, Students Accuse Admin Of Mismanagement
GK CITY CORRESPONDENT
Srinagar, Nov 29: With half of the City under curfew Thursday it was a tough time for schoolchildren in making it to schools while the parent community too had to face helplessness. With the Directorate More
Civil Secretariat Deserted, Ministers Don’t Attend Offices
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL POLLS
Jammu, Nov 29: Functioning of almost all the government departments has come to a grinding halt as the ministers have deserted the civil secretariat due to their “busy schedule” in the ongoing campaign More
- South Asia
Islamabad, Nov 29: The Pakistani doctor who helped the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hunt down Osama bin Laden started a hunger strike in his jail cell this week to protest against his living conditions More
EDITH M. LEDERER
United Nations, Nov 29: The Palestinians are certain to win UN recognition as a state in a General Assembly vote that Israel and the United States warn could delay hopes of achieving an independent Palestinian More