‘Productive screen time maybe necessary to meet learning outcomes’

The Union HRD Ministry’s cap on duration of online classes has thrown private schools in a quandary as they try to strike a balance between “good” and “bad” screen time, while trying to address curriculum concerns of senior classes.

The guidelines have been framed by the Ministry, following concerns raised by parents about schools conducting online classes like regular schools, which has increased children’s screen time after the COVID19 pandemic mandated a shift from classroom teaching to online learning as schools continue to remain shut for over four months.

   

“The reduction of screen time for students during online classes is quite apt for primary classes but for senior classes, it might cause problems. In junior classes, syllabus can be covered through projects and other co-curricular activities. The recorded flip classes is yet another way to complete the syllabus in junior and middle classes,” Alka Kapur, Principal, Modern Public School Shalimar Bagh, said.

“Moreover, in junior classes, parents can still help children cover up the syllabus by giving them ample practice at home. However, in senior classes, most of the topics being vast and elaborate require in-depth understanding and explanation. Hence, screen time given by the MHRD may not be sufficient. Rigorous revision and practice will be a herculean task for the teacher and the students in senior classes if we continue in the given scenario,” she added. According to Manit Jain, Co-Founder of The Heritage Schools, there has to be a distinction between “good” and “bad” screen time.

“While most of the guidelines are relevant it is important to make a distinction between good and bad screen time. Putting restrictions on timings without analysing the effect on learning continuity will have an adverse impact on students’ development. There are several myths around online learning that need to be busted and policymakers must recognise that productive screen time is not only desirable but is necessary in such times,” he said.

“Many countries continue to run their entire timetables as they did when they were running in the physical environment. What if learning remains interrupted for the next 18 months? What might be the potential learning loss? What happens in international boards, where they will not cut substantial portions of the syllabus?

“What will happen to the last child who will not have access to a home environment that can compensate for the learning losses?,” said Jain, who is also chairman of FICCI Arise, a collegium of stakeholders aimed at promoting quality education.

In the guidelines called “Pragyata”, the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) has recommended that the duration for online classes for pre-primary students should not be for more than 30 minutes. For classes 1 to 8, the HRD Ministry has recommended two online sessions of up to 45 minutes each while for classes 9 to 12, four sessions of 30-45 minutes duration have been recommended. “The recommendation provided by the HRD Ministry is based on complaints by parents that regular online classes have increased children’s screen time after the COVID-19 pandemic. The research is not done scientifically as according to a new online teaching research, during online classes, gaze does not remain fixed for a long time and it is not at all dangerous for the students.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × 4 =