An irked India on Monday lodged a strong protest with the UN rights office over its report on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir, slamming it as a continuation of the earlier “false and motivated” narrative and violative of India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
In a strong reaction, the External Affairs Ministry said the report ignores the core issue of cross-border terrorism and seems to accord a legitimacy to terrorism that is in complete variance with positions of UN Security Council, which had strongly condemned the dastardly Pulwama attack and subsequently proscribed Masood Azhar.
India’s retort came after the Geneva-based Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which last year released its first-ever report on Kashmir, issued an ‘update’ of the 2018 report on Monday, claiming that “neither India nor Pakistan have taken any concrete steps to address the numerous concerns raised”.
Replying to a query about the report, MEA Spokesperson Raveesh Kumar in New Delhi said the update of the earlier OHCHR report is “merely a continuation of the earlier false and motivated narrative” on the situation in J-K.
Kumar also asserted that the report’s assertions are in violation of India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and ignore the core issue of cross-border terrorism.
“A situation created by years of cross-border terrorist attacks emanating from Pakistan has been ‘analysed’ without any reference to its causality,” Kumar said.
“The update seems to be a contrived effort to create an artificial parity between the world’s largest and the most vibrant democracy and a country that openly practices state-sponsored terrorism,” he said.
“We have registered our strong protest regarding the update with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The release of such an update has not only called into question the seriousness of OHCHR but also its alignment with the larger approach of the United Nations,” Kumar said.
Expressing “deep concern” that the report seems to accord a legitimacy to terrorism that is in complete variance with UNSC positions, Kumar said, “the UNSC had, in February 2019, strongly condemned the dastardly Pulwama terror attack and subsequently proscribed Masood Azhar, the self-styled leader of Jaish-e-Mohammed. However, in the update, militant leaders and organisations sanctioned by the UN are deliberately underplayed as ‘armed groups’.”
“The legitimisation of terrorism has been further compounded by an unacceptable advocacy of the dismemberment of a UN member state”, the MEA spokesperson said.
India follows the policy of zero tolerance towards terrorism and will take all measures to protect its territorial integrity and sovereignty against cross-border terrorism, Kumar said.
“Motivated attempts to weaken our national resolve will never succeed.”
Asserting that the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India, Kumar said “Pakistan is in illegal and forcible occupation of a part of the Indian state, including the so called “Azad Jammu and Kashmir” and “Gilgit-Baltistan”.
India has repeatedly called on Pakistan to vacate these occupied territories,” he said.
The report, by distorting India’s policies, practices and values, has undermined its own credibility, he said.
The report’s failure to recognise an independent judiciary, human rights institutions and other mechanisms in Jammu and Kashmir that safeguard, protect and promote constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights to all citizens of India is “unpardonable”, Kumar said.
“Even more so, as it belittles constitutional provisions, statutory procedures and established practices in an established functioning democracy,” Kumar said. The “prejudiced mindset” of the update has also chosen to wilfully ignore the determined and comprehensive socioeconomic developmental efforts undertaken by the Indian government in the face of challenges posed by terrorists, he added.