Weed out the biases

The birth of  a stillborn on the roadside in Srinagar  in the freezing cold on the night of January 17  because the hospital refused to  admit the lady in labour pains  is a momentous  man-made tragedy. It speaks for the insensitivity  prevalent in our society. It also tells us the unprofessionalism that has ingrained  in our system  because we have  developed a strong feeling that the current conflict  is the best shield against any call for accountability. And, what happened  to Surya Begum of Moori, Kupwara,  at Lal Ded  hospital,  Srinagar,  and the remarks  with which the doctor lashed with her and her attendants should make us all search  ourselves for manifestation of racial bias as well. But the  January 17  incident is – must be – larger  than that. That is what we need to study in-depth. 

The whole incident  points out to many problems  existing within our society, and to say that there are no social issues involved in the system would be denying the obvious.  The selective outrage by the leaders, to whom the social media has become a convenient tool to comment on  anything under the sun from the very comfort of their bed rooms and well-heated  residences can never imagine and feel the pain that Surya Begum  felt while on the road and after  giving birth to the still born in minus temperatures.  

   

Two lives were snatched away – the lady became mother but could not stay long as mother, and the child who did not breathe even for a second in the chill of the “Chillai Kalan” on that ill-fated night All this because they were treated unfairly and inhumanely  by the system of which that doctor was a part. The tragedy  was man-made  and also the result of the hollow system  with which we have  compromised  because of our greed and reconciliation to the idea that nothing could improve. We are equal partners in the tragedy that  befell that Kupwara family.

The whole blame, as of now, has been  laid at the doorstep of the doctor  who  refused to provide a shelter to the patient for a night, knowing that  what fate could have awaited the woman in labour pains outside  in the bone-chilling cold.

The doctor is a  part of the  defective system  that we have  allowed to grow, and the politicians have patronised over the years.Today, we may boast of our rich heritage and sense of accommodation, but isn’t it a fact that  this particular incident at Lal Ded, the largest maternity  hospital in Kashmir, is not the isolated  one. There must have been many other cases  of the similar nature that have gone unreported or unnoticed.

There also is a need to understand, why did the concerned doctor, who has been shifted out of the hospital, for  her unprofessional attitude, which many would call ” unethical”, too,  did what she did.  Were her personal biases at  work,or was she behaving as an extension  of the class conflict that hides all our unbecoming acts. 

This  individual act has many dimensions, which need to be studied and understood further, because the whole truth will not come out with  merely the administrative inquiries, which  would attempt to reconstruct the reconstruct the scene, and then quiz doctor about it  before drawing its conclusions and recommendations. There have been so many inquiries in the past and the final outcome is not unknown to us- nothing happens. The system is so immune to the change and reform.  For sure, no one would read even those recommendations, because the social system is so wrecked from within  that it cannot be repaired over night  by one or a series of inquiries. More than  administrative intervention, it requires social intervention.

The fact is that the interpersonal relations have nosedived. It  also is true that  over the decades we have developed a systematic and structural  bias in our approach and attitude  toward almost everything. As long as we are happy, or satisfied with the system that can cater to our needs, we can afford to look other way. And when there are such incidents in which a hapless woman is thrown out of the hospital, our selective  outrage is manifested in social media. Thereafter, everything is forgotten. 

Worse, is that  we tend to see that no one sees our biased and unprofessional acts  because there is a large smokescreen of the conflict that hides all our acts of omission and  commission. The professional  duty and the inter personal relations should not be determined by  on which side of the conflict we choose to live or act.  There is a need to  understand the pain in the real sense, so that the malaise in our society is weeded out. We don’t need Surya Begum’s  example to  shake our conscience. 

binoojoshi61@gmail.com 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 − 2 =